My team is the Bears and latest rumor is they're looking to trade back per Adam Schefter.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Well, with the run of QBs after, we'll see in about 4 years. I'm hoping Pace knew something the rest of us didn't but the fact they had little contact with the kid outside of one workout around his pro day makes me nervous.John Lynch is a quick learner. He completely played the Bears.
Well, with the run of QBs after, we'll see in about 4 years. I'm hoping Pace knew something the rest of us didn't but the fact they had little contact with the kid outside of one workout around his pro day makes me nervous.
No, getting out from under Cutler's deal was the right move considering his performance and he was becoming injury prone. They did sign Glennon and it's only a 2 year deal so I would have preferred to see what we had with him as opposed to taking Trubisky because I wasn't 100% sold on any of the QBs in this draft.Sooo.... you're wishing the Bears would have kept the franchise leader (in QB stats)?
I was listening on the radio as i drove home last night. when the Bears traded up (but before their pick), I swore I heard you cry out in anger from a few miles away.My Bears just traded up. WTF?
Gave up 3rd and 4th and 2018 3rd round pick to move up for one fucking slot.
No, getting out from under Cutler's deal was the right move considering his performance and he was becoming injury prone. They did sign Glennon and it's only a 2 year deal so I would have preferred to see what we had with him as opposed to taking Trubisky because I wasn't 100% sold on any of the QBs in this draft.
I did like Watson the best... feels a lot like Russel Wilson to me. But who knows. QBs always are the biggest crap shoots of them all it feels like.
nabbing glennon was a better move than moving up for terbiscky... watson would have been a better pick, if for no other reason(s) he had far more experience and he the two times he played the "best team"... he had great games.
agree on qbs and crap-shoots; especially in today's college to nfl game; some college qbs haven't taken a snap under center in years
I think we need to pump the breaks on Wentz. I need to get 3-4 more years down the road before I anoint him as a great draft pick. He had the 26th best QBR with 16 TDs and 14 picks. Jury is still out on him but overall, I do agree with you that experience doesn't matter IF the player has all of the other tangible and intangibles to be a great QB. Wentz does seem to have those, no argument from me there.Does experience really matter? I believe Wentz only started games his junior year (15?) and of the National Championship his senior year. He was drafted number 2 overall. My only problem with the Bears pick was they could have had him at 3 and not given away the farm to trade up one spot.
As with all things...if he wins all will be forgotten/foregiven. Winning cures ALL problems and that really is all people care about.
Totally agree. Angelo used to be a master at that, especially those 3rd and 4th rounders. As for drafting a QB, this is the first the Bears have gone "all in" drafting a QB, the highest pick ever used on one. I think they have to try to move out of their 2nd round pick if they can move down 10-15 spots and make back a 3rd rounder. I think the Broncos and Ravens could be two good partners to get that done. If the Steelers coveted someone, I believe they have two late 3rd rounders... anything to get more bodies in Halas.What concerned me about the trade is giving up the later picks. In the past the Bears have made good moves in the latter rounds they have found a few diamonds in the rough. Its the first round picks the Bears swing and miss on.
Why is that some teams always seem to pick good at some positions and terrible at others. Example: Green Bay has had great success at QB drafting. The Bears over the years have done well on defense and in particular Middle Linebacker. Funny how that goes. Other than JM what other successful QB have the Bears drafted in modern times?
What concerned me about the trade is giving up the later picks. In the past the Bears have made good moves in the latter rounds they have found a few diamonds in the rough. Its the first round picks the Bears swing and miss on.
Why is that some teams always seem to pick good at some positions and terrible at others. Example: Green Bay has had great success at QB drafting. The Bears over the years have done well on defense and in particular Middle Linebacker. Funny how that goes. Other than JM what other successful QB have the Bears drafted in modern times?
The Packers have drafted Rogers in recent years. Who else? They got Favre in a trade....
Looks like I was spot on with trading down to recoup picks. The Arizona Cardinals moved up to Chicago’s previous No. 36 slot to get Washington safety Budda Baker and in the process gave up their second-round pick (No. 45), their fourth-rounder this year (No. 119), their sixth-rounder this year (No. 197), and Arizona’s 2018 fourth-rounder.Totally agree. Angelo used to be a master at that, especially those 3rd and 4th rounders. As for drafting a QB, this is the first the Bears have gone "all in" drafting a QB, the highest pick ever used on one. I think they have to try to move out of their 2nd round pick if they can move down 10-15 spots and make back a 3rd rounder. I think the Broncos and Ravens could be two good partners to get that done. If the Steelers coveted someone, I believe they have two late 3rd rounders... anything to get more bodies in Halas.