CNBC compares ISU football to the Washington Generals

WANTED: Passionate Sycamore Fanatics. That You?

Register NOW to join our community of die-hard Sycamore fans.


Become a Supporting Member to remove this ad and help support the site.
Twit...:censored:

But I did take the whole thing to be a bit tongue-in-cheek. You really gotta wonder what the AD at Virginia Tech was thinking when he handed over the $500,000 check for the loss. That had to hurt...

Someone should keep a copy of that article and send it back to him when we beat IU or Purdue in the next few years. That would be funny!!!
 
How ironic that a pair of ISU Basketballers played for the Generals for several years in the 70's. I suppose we shouldn't leak that out to CNBC, should we? BTW, until we start winning more than a game a year, that kind of thing will continue. Hopefully, that will be THIS YEAR! That article isn't as bad as the one's being written when we were approaching Columbia's losing streak.
 

Become a Supporting Member to remove this ad and help support the site.
How ironic that a pair of ISU Basketballers played for the Generals for several years in the 70's. I suppose we shouldn't leak that out to CNBC, should we? BTW, until we start winning more than a game a year, that kind of thing will continue. Hopefully, that will be THIS YEAR! That article isn't as bad as the one's being written when we were approaching Columbia's losing streak.

Yep. Until ISU starts winning, it will continue to take lumps. Nothing he wrote was false after all.
 
I'm guessing he didn't notice our half time score against Cincy was 12-7.

What did the half time score get us? Just curious?

I two see nothing wrong with article - we have won 1 game (granted in convincing fashion) against a lesser opponent that we should have beat badly... I don't see why anyone should be to outraged by this article? Maybe outraged at the fact that this is how bad things got, but blaming the reporter for our losing ways... Pshh please!
 
What did the half time score get us? Just curious?

I two see nothing wrong with article - we have won 1 game (granted in convincing fashion) against a lesser opponent that we should have beat badly... I don't see why anyone should be to outraged by this article? Maybe outraged at the fact that this is how bad things got, but blaming the reporter for our losing ways... Pshh please!

A little respect from those paying attention. Staying that close through the first half with a team that just played in the Sugar Bowl in January is not something to scoff at or put down. That's what I take exception to. Take a shot at us fine, but to ignore, or be unaware, that we gave Cincy all they could handle for a half is lazy and incomplete reporting.
 
One of the national games I was watching on Saturday commented specifically about our score at the half so I would say it DID have a significance, if for no one other than OURSELVES, but a coast-to-comment can't hurt. Moral victories don't count either, but sometimes that is what they are.
 
I agree, nothing wrong with that article at all. Everyone at ISU knows the team is going in the right direction, and I agree with the comment at the end, if one of the I-A schools on the ISU schedule backs out, then ISU should up the ante and get more money from the next school who wants ISU to come play them.

and who knows, it's not likely, but if IU and Purdue continue to be as bad as they have been recently it's not entirely out of the question that ISU could put a good scare into them in a few yrs.

just gotta be patient....
 

Become a Supporting Member to remove this ad and help support the site.
Im just saying the article is pointless. It is literally written as a fluff piece, not to be taken seriously...it was toungue and cheek because he had nothing else to write about that day. Besides, why would you take any journalistic venture on the CNBC website about sports serious? It was sarcastic in everyway.

ISU athletics will be the subject of jokes for a long time until they show some winning ways. That is starting to happen in most sports and those jokes will slowly go away...just like the smell in TH jokes...those are slowly dying too.
 
guess i'm the optimist -- I took the cnbc article as a jab at the FBS schools who kept paying the 'wrong teams' to beat them...

Given our record over the past couple of years... I wasn't offended; seriously, what State fan could be offended by that article?

Jax St is the class of the OVC; James Madison is a really good program in arguably the best FCS conf today (Colonial)

Give TMiles a couple more years and he'll be mentioning State receiving $500K for thumping gloomington..
 
guess i'm the optimist -- I took the cnbc article as a jab at the FBS schools who kept paying the 'wrong teams' to beat them...

Given our record over the past couple of years... I wasn't offended; seriously, what State fan could be offended by that article?

Jax St is the class of the OVC; James Madison is a really good program in arguably the best FCS conf today (Colonial)

Give TMiles a couple more years and he'll be mentioning State receiving $500K for thumping gloomington..

We might get the game but the money won't come unless we can sell tickets...Can cnbc say Sycamores 2 and 1. Let's see what kinda spin that will have 'cause it sure has a good ring. Thanks coach Miles for steadying our ship. Are you ready for some football?
 
At first I had a problem with the article....

but then I got thinking about it. What a way to fund your program!!!! Hey, schedule Indiana State!!!! If those major schools want to schedule the Sycamores bad enough, just let them ante up!!!! Indiana State should hold out for the very best guarantees from every so-called major school that may want to play them.

In years past, when ISU played major schools in football, the Sycamores would often settle for less of a guarantee than other I-AA schools would get for playing the same opponent or type of opponent. Indiana State was basically screwing itself out of more lucrative deals by settling for less.

So since the Sycamores are such an easy opponent, according to Darren Rovell, then those schools can pay for the priviledge of facing Indiana State. Then ISU can take that money, put the majority of it back into the football program and help pay for things that the program needs.

One caveat, though. If ISU is getting big paydays from those schools for playing them in football, then the football program should get the biggest share of that money reinvested back. In the past, the football program would take the risk (of injuries to key players) by playing those major schools but wouldn't partake in the benefits of the monies brought in by playing those type of games.
 
Last edited:
but then I got thinking about it. What a way to fund your program!!!! Hey, schedule Indiana State!!!! If those major schools want to schedule the Sycamores bad enough, just let them ante up!!!! Indiana State should hold out for the very best guarantees from every so-called major school that may want to play them.

In years past, when ISU played major schools in football, the Sycamores would often settle for less of a guarantee than other I-AA schools would for playing the same opponent or type of opponent. Indiana State was basically screwing itself out of more lucrative deals by settling for less.

So since the Sycamores are such an easy opponent, then pay for the priviledge of facing Indiana State. Then ISU can take that money, put the majority of it back into the football program and help pay for things that the program needs.

One caveat, though. If ISU is getting big paydays from those schools for playing them in football, then the football program should get the biggest share of that money reinvested back. In the past, the football program would take the risk (of injuries to key players) by playing those major schools but wouldn't partake in the benefits of the monies brought in by playing those type of games.

Oooo, shock me...
 

Become a Supporting Member to remove this ad and help support the site.
... One caveat, though. If ISU is getting big paydays from those schools for playing them in football, then the football program should get the biggest share of that money reinvested back. In the past, the football program would take the risk (of injuries to key players) by playing those major schools but wouldn't partake in the benefits of the monies brought in by playing those type of games.

I'm on the fence, I understand your point but IMO it can also lead to 'splintering' within the Ath Dept.

The same line of thinking would be for the NCAA $$$ from the MBB should stay within the MBB budget.

Rightly/Wrongly outside of MBB and Football; the majority of college sports fans don't follow, cheer for, support, care about the 'non-revenue'

Definitely an issue for RP and his folks to solve
 
So we should fire Miles and go back to running a horrible program just so we can get bigger paydays as a can't miss victory. That's basically what you guys are saying. No one is going to get into a bidding war over us if we're improving, and none of the big boys want the heat that comes with playing an opponent that is seen as too easy. The article was shortsighted and this discussion is as well.
 
Say what? Good 1-AA teams get games against BCS teams all the time. Just because we are improving does NOT mean we are not going to get to play these money games. That is ridiculous. We are not saying anything about hoping our program returns to it's old losing ways. That is preposterous, period. Villanova is playing some big time programs and they are the defending 1-AA champs. James Madison was a strong 1-AA team last year and they just beat Va Tech. Indiana State will continue to improve and we will continue to play money games. Remember when we almost beat Florida? We were a 1-AA playoff team the same year.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top