Not trying to change your mind at all...but how in the world is a coach supposed to get the needed "coaching experience" if he doesn't go coach at a HS? Sure their are and always will be questionable situations where coaches, alumni, parents, etc. get hired to help or suggest or push an athlete to a specific school. But, the reality is that no one wins in this situation and it become a political mess for the institution and the alumni/fans and the general public. Alumni/Fans get upset if someone that could help isn't hired, Rivals/other programs get upset if the institution does hire the person that can help. It is a no win in terms of fan base,etc. But the reality is that alumni donors and fans dictate the need to hire persons that have experience and possibly even personal connections to talent. IU, or Notre Dame or USC or UNC don't have to make you happy, they have to make their alumni happy, their sponosors happy, their endorsers happy. This shouldn't be a violation, because it would simply be impossible to stop it from happening. There is no possible way for the NCAA to determine if the fact that an athlete attends a specific school is because that school hired someone they once met or coached them in middle school or was an AAU coach. It is literally impossible to administer a policy like that.
I understand the points all have made...but I don't think that there is any possibility of a policy/violation being put in place for this type of situation. At IU, if an athlete that once played for this guy were interviewed, he would simply say, I came to IU because of the tradition, the program, the town, the location, the school of business, the trees, the colors, the fact that basketball is king instead of football, whatever he wants and as long as he never said it was because of "this guy" then the NCAA couldn't do anything.
Maybe I am completely wrong, but I just don't see why this is an issue. And I would say, why doesn't ISU do the same?