The lack of OT substitution has been beaten to death and adequately commented upon
..............................................................Bradley................ISU
Players > 40 minutes.......................2........................4
Players >30 minutes........................5.......................5
Players >20 minutes.......................8.........................5...............Bradley used depth to end up with only two players above 40 minutes
Only Young at 16.5 minutes was "+" on +/- at +8. Alocen and ESB with similar minutes were 0.
Both teams should have been better at FT line. Both could have argued it lost the game at the line. ISU: 30/43 and BU 17/27
Bradley had been averaging -3 RBD Margin/game, but was +6 last night. That could be a quality of opposition affected number
One core group of ISU players played 18.5 minutes together and that included the closing minutes of regulation and essentially all of the three OT's. Since the final margin ballooned to 9 points, each of those 5 guys got hit with a -9 for the 3rd OT in the +/- calculation.
Player.....................Minutes............Rbds............A/TO............Pts.................+/-.............Comments
Scott........................49.......................12................2/2................24..................-17.................Incredible effort coming off illness. He was also credited with 3 blocks, but I counted at least 4
Vorst........................42.......................11................2/1................17..................-5...................By far most minutes he has ever seen; even came back from minor injury
Young.....................16.5....................1...................3/2...............2.......................+8..............2.1 PPM was highest by far for any ISU Player. His inconsistency can be maddening, BUT...
Wagner...................51.5...................6..................1/0................21....................-12...............+/- worsened by -9 in 3rd OT; #3 scored 8 quick points on him to open the game
Hall..........................44.......................5..................5/2................16.....................-11...............lost 9 pts in +/- in 3rd OT. Was probably only ISU player not visibly exhausted.
Alocen....................18.25................3....................2/1...............6.........................0..................2/7 from field BUT the team performs better when he is on the floor. Shut down #3
JVB..........................36.5....................0...................3/5................7......................-8..................+/- in 3rd OT was -9; Made big shot but 5 TO's is a lot
St. Bernard............17......................4....................0/1...............6.........................0................. As noted, conspicuous by his absence in 2nd half and OT
Bean.........................9 seconds......0....................0/0..............0.........................0.....................In the scorebook
Combinations Data:
Combination:...............................................................................Minutes.............PPM...............PPP............Combo +/-
JVB, Wagner, Scott, Hall, Vorst...............................................18.5....................1.57...............1.04................-12.........Last 3 minutes of regulation and 3 OT's essentially
Young, Wagner, Scott, Hall, Vorst..........................................12.25.................1.88...............1.18................+6.........Quite Effective same group with Young for JVB
Alocen, JVB, Wagner, St. Bernard, Vorst..............................5.5......................2.78...............1.19................+5...........High Offensive output & +5
Alocen, JVB, Wagner, St. Bernard, Scott.............................4.5......................1.75................0.86.................+1..........
Hall, JVB, Wagner, St. Bernard, Scott....................................3.75..................1.3....................0.833.............-5............Not much offense
Hall, Young, Alocen, Vorst, Scott...........................................2.75.....................3.375.............2.08...............+3............First Half comeback group I think
Hall,Wagner, Alocen, JVB Scott..............................................1.75....................1.61................1.6..................+1............
Hall, Wagner,Alocen,Vorst. Scott..........................................1.5.........................0.......................0...................-6...........Devastating 1.5 minutes
Hall, Wagner, Young, St. Bernard, Scott..............................1.25.......................0.......................0....................-4...........Same for this 1.25 minutes
Alocen, WagnerJVB, Vorst, Scott...........................................1.25.........................0.876.............0.347............-4...........5 minutes of action and -14 on the scoreboard