Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Hope that's correct.
You could see this coming from a mile away.
If we're being honest, statistically speaking it doesn't work out. I am hoping like hell we'll buck the trend. I think the most successful D2 to D1 guy in the last decade is Darner and he's winning at 53% which is where Lansing was in a lesser conference. Unless I'm missing out on a big one, most of the ones I found are sub .500. I gave up after about 20-30 minutes of digging.
That said, when I was reading on Schertz, Belmont's old man Byrd was a head coach at LMU before Belmont so I'm taking that as a sign. Maybe it's LMU that is the key.
It was tongue-in-cheek.C'mon Jason... you're stretching it to believe Byrd's short stint at LMU was reason for his success at Belmont. Belmont MBB is what it is because of Ricky Byrd - period. HE built that program, when he left LMU for Belmont, he changed conferences, Belmont was still an NAIA program than, he spent 10 years building the Bruins into a better NAIA program, they moved to NCAA DI and struggled for 5-7 seasons as an independent, new Atlantic Sun member... Belmont MBB 1st season on a way to their current place was the 2005-06 season, Byrd's 1st (of 8) NCAA berth
Your example of Darner is far, FAR more legit; Darner had some really good years at St. Joseph's up in Rensselaer, he moved to FLA Southern for $$$ support from the school; great success, he jumps to GreenBay does OK, not enough to satisfy ISU fans and is canned b/c the AD wanted his own guy...
Maybe Schertz does what Byrd did... but his Bruins made the NCAA in his 20th year at Belmont, the NIT in his 18th
Schertz’s .833 winning percentage from 2008-21 at LMU is No. 3 all-time at any level of college basketball for coaches with at least 10 years’ experience, according to the latest NCAA records, behind only Jim Crutchfield of West Liberty and Nova Southeastern (.841), and Mark Few of Gonzaga (.834).
Whew -- that post was beginning to sound like the wild-ass speculation of others!It was tongue-in-cheek.
Talk about missed opportunities from way back. Never realized Thad Matta was an assistant coach for ISU during the 1990-1991 season.
I am fascinated to see Schertz assessment of this roster and what holes he thinks he needs to fill immediately to fit the style of play he wants.
There should be a handful of high school and JUCO offers go out immediately for guys that didn't find a home on Signing Day.
Sounds like the current NBA trend, which is where players want to be, no matter how realistic that might be. It will be interesting to see how it translates.No problems with recruiting bigs, wings and points; not a fan of prioritizing the 3
I think a lot of our current players could fit the system provided they are given the opportunity to play that style. I would love to see Neese with more freedom. Not that he didn’t have it before, but he was much more hesitant to fire away under Lansing’s system (or so it seemed).Of what's left? He's really only got Cam, Larry, Ndaw and Hittle, right? Everyone else is a walk-on so not much evaluating to be done. LOL
Seriously though, in watching his team play this weekend, we don't have the shooters his style needs to open up the space. His LMU team has 4 guys that shot over 40% from 3 (3 with qualifiable attempts) and our best, Neese, would have sat 5th on their team at just under 40%. Bacote did shoot 50% but he only had 18 attempts but I think he is one that could do well in his system.
Of the guys that entered the portal, Jake would be well served in his system as would Hankins and Neese. Jake would essentially operate as their Guest kid, did. He is going to need to find at least two shooters and would be better served with 3 knowing how Drake trended this year with them having DeVries coming in next year. If Jake does go, he needs to find a stretch 4 like Jake/Guest.
If I'm being honest, Larry and Ndaw don't fit. I have no idea what we've got in Hittle so I'm not going to speak on him until I can see live action. If he does anything this upcoming offseason, it should be working on his shooting. Specifically, he would be well served to go back and watch Jake Kitchell highlights and develop that baseline jumper Kitch had because if he does, that would also lend well to floor spacing -- give slashers lanes and him being the kick option.
He also has two 6-5, 6-6 lanky types that slash/attacked in the game I watched the other night. We don't have any of those on the roster so scouring the transfer portal and finding at least one of those would be huge.