I thought the Bracketbuster games originated on the premise to help benefit the non bcs schools by aiding with tv time, higher rpi rankings and match comparable opponents to increase S.O.S.
A-10- RPI 7
(NOT PARTICAPATING)
MVC- RPI 8
ALL TEAMS
West Coast – RPI 12
St.Marys
Gonzaga (NOT PARTICAPATING)
Sunbelt – RPI 15 (NOT PARTICAPATING)
Guess it will hurt South Alabama and Western Kentucky chances of getting a bid
What benefit is there for MVC teams to play lesser competition at home or on the road? Few MVC bracket buster opponents are close in rpi rankings. Butler vs Drake is the most beneficial match up, which leans toward helping Butler and the Horizon league.
What is the benefit for ISU to play a team with a rpi rating of 50 rankings less? This does nothing to help with post season tournament goals. .
How about a Atlantic 10 vs MVC Challenge??
A-10- RPI 7
(NOT PARTICAPATING)
MVC- RPI 8
ALL TEAMS
West Coast – RPI 12
St.Marys
Gonzaga (NOT PARTICAPATING)
Sunbelt – RPI 15 (NOT PARTICAPATING)
Guess it will hurt South Alabama and Western Kentucky chances of getting a bid
What benefit is there for MVC teams to play lesser competition at home or on the road? Few MVC bracket buster opponents are close in rpi rankings. Butler vs Drake is the most beneficial match up, which leans toward helping Butler and the Horizon league.
What is the benefit for ISU to play a team with a rpi rating of 50 rankings less? This does nothing to help with post season tournament goals. .
How about a Atlantic 10 vs MVC Challenge??
Last edited: