My logic is simple. See if you can understand this? Curtis is bad for ISU! Rankin wasn’t.
Gotcha -- you let some pres. pass the buck, others, you hold accountable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
My logic is simple. See if you can understand this? Curtis is bad for ISU! Rankin wasn’t.
On the contrary. Rankin never did anything to undermine the spirit and reputation of our university. Our status grew from college to university and enrollment soared under his administration.Gotcha -- you let some pres. pass the buck, others, you hold accountable.
Curtis doesn’t deserve any kind of pass and never will.Rankin had the luxury of presiding over Ind State College from 1965-1975.
Quick, tell me ONE thing in America during that period that DRAMATICALLY increased college enrollment across the 50 states?
If Rankin was so phenomenal, he'd have told Slim to process the application to join the MAC - NOW!
The hare-brained idea to create a new conference from nothing was chasing fools' gold.
If Curtis is to blame for all ills, poor decisions during her tenure -- EVERY ISU President carries that same yoke.
Remember, the buck stops with the (Univ.) Pres.
Curtis doesn’t deserve any kind of pass and never will.
Please explain why you continue to come to her defense at every opportunity?
Should she stay?Not sure I've defended vs. refusing to pile on with the rest of the villagers to storm the castle and kill the monster
It takes more than one monster to destroy a village
Why do you refuse to admit that the Univ. President is the Head Person In Charge?
If the MAC was the best answer for ISC, ISU in the late 1960s, why blame Slim Chalmers?
Place the blame where it should lie - Rankin
Bottom line is a failed bit. Our enrollment issue is very serious. Today is what we need to focus on.Should she stay?
Or, should she go?