Isn’t Teel a senior?
This is an eligibility chart. There were multiple stories and tweets that says he has two years of eligibility remaining.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Isn’t Teel a senior?
You mean for 25-26. We don't have any needs now.
If they bring in someone that would crack the top 9 it wouldn't matter what position. Otherwise Cannon doesn't need to be replaced.No, we have one more spot for this year -- replacing Cannon.
If they bring in someone that would crack the top 9 it wouldn't matter what position. Otherwise Cannon doesn't need to be replaced.
Roster weakness?? Where is that?Yeah, we definitely shouldn't bring in anyone to develop for future need or roster weakness.
Roster weakness?? Where is that?
You mean for 25-26?
Ok. Didn't realize 3 months. I see your point. Perhaps not likely, but still think coaching staff signs someone for '24-'25 if they believe the recruit or transfer helps the team this year & possibly beyond.25's sign in 3 months. i wouldn't think they would sign someone now.
Teel is in his last year of eligibility. Coach has said many times “we have 4 seniors.” Unless the ncaa gets taken to court and loses then Teel won’t have another year. The ncaa has been fighting it in courts and has already won against the Ivy League players whose season was canceled by their league during Covid.Isn’t Teel a senior?
I'm not high on "stretch four" but I agree if they could sign a 4 that would play in front of JD, that's fine. But I have always thought JD could play and I certainly expect him to advance this year.We don't have a single proven stretch four on this roster.
who do you see as the top 8 players?Curious... Not that size and weight matter much... But I wonder if there is enough data available to compare last season's team to this season's team with the height and weight of top 8 players? Well... Might be impossible to know who our top 8 could be? Just curious.... Because physically we were able to hold our own enough in most cases last season. Our speed was an offset too.
Hardingwho do you see as the top 8 players?
I averaged height of the roster & compared it to last year's, of all players. Posted it couple months ago.Curious... Not that size and weight matter much... But I wonder if there is enough data available to compare last season's team to this season's team with the height and weight of top 8 players? Well... Might be impossible to know who our top 8 could be? Just curious.... Because physically we were able to hold our own enough in most cases last season. Our speed was an offset too.
Yup... And Robbie was a defensive liability against a semi-skilled big.Just from watching some game and highlight videos, I don't think a comparison to last year's team is an unreasonable comparison. I'm not saying we are going to win 32 games, but I think we will be very competitive and capable of winning a lot of games.
We probably did not replace Robbie's passing and decision-making or Kent's cutting and rebounding; but we look to be deeper out to 8-9 players.
Yes, we can probably improve there. Robbie and Kent, though, were both key players for our offense. I had forgotten but we scored over 100 in 2 NIT games. We gave up a lot of points in those games too.Yup... And Robbie was a defensive liability against a semi-skilled big.
Alderink is not Top 8. Graves has already said he isn't ready.Harding
Vorst
Gray
Teel
Cook
Alderink
Daughtry
Summers
Legree... Only because it's interesting he reclassified.
Doughty
There is 10 lol