Hanging "Low" Has it's Consequences...

WANTED: Passionate Sycamore Fanatics. That You?

Register NOW to join our community of die-hard Sycamore fans.

Register Log in

Become a Supporting Member to remove this ad and help support the site.
Dgreenwell3 said:
Tend to agree with the second quote on there...
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, I do too... even though I CAN'T STAND "sagging".

from a guy that was on the plane said:
“When I get on a plane and see a 13-year-old girl with her whale tail”—exposed G-string underwear—”and fat old white guys with plumber’s crack sitting down, and middle-aged ladies in halter tops and tons of cleavage—if you’re not going to kick those people off the plane or ask them to cover up, then let’s admit the hypocrisy.”
Click to expand...
 
I think the consequences were more associated with the low rider's ATTITUDE than anything else...

As far as middle-aged ladies flashing cleavage in halter tops, what's wrong with that?
Geesh...what's this world coming to?
 
BankShot said:
I think the consequences were more associated with the low rider's ATTITUDE than anything else...

As far as middle-aged ladies flashing cleavage in halter tops, what's wrong with that?
Geesh...what's this world coming to?
Click to expand...

The consequences only happened because someone took offense to him exposing his boxers by having his shorts too low. He was asked to leave the airplane because it allegedly violated US Airways' "dress code" (searching the US Airways website and Contract of Carriage reveals no such dress code except for something called AD75 booking) but the hypocrisy comes from the fact that he was asked to leave, but cleavage (which exposes much more flesh but is "sexy" and not "a menacing black man"?) is acceptable, middle-aged white guys showing "plumber's crack" is acceptable, and so on. The hypocrisy is why people are taking issue with this.
 

Become a Supporting Member to remove this ad and help support the site.
Hammer and Sycamore said:
The consequences only happened because someone took offense to him exposing his boxers by having his shorts too low. He was asked to leave the airplane because it allegedly violated US Airways' "dress code" (searching the US Airways website and Contract of Carriage reveals no such dress code except for something called AD75 booking) but the hypocrisy comes from the fact that he was asked to leave, but cleavage (which exposes much more flesh but is "sexy" and not "a menacing black man"?) is acceptable, middle-aged white guys showing "plumber's crack" is acceptable, and so on. The hypocrisy is why people are taking issue with this.
Click to expand...

"sexy" is in the eye of the beholder...

Absolutely agree on the hypocrisy point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top