IS ANYBODY ELSE BOYCOTTING THE OLYMPICS?

WANTED: Passionate Sycamore Fanatics. That You?

Register NOW to join our community of die-hard Sycamore fans.

well for starters...

body autonomy...

right to vote...

whom a person can love openly...

whom a person can marry legally...

the right of a person to use birth control...
I'm not so sure the government should allow anyone to get married these days. I partially joke, but it's definitely great business for the divorce lawyers and the judges that hear the cases when half of them ultimately fail down the road.
 

Become a Supporting Member to remove this ad and help support the site.
I will also say the locker room talk doesn’t bother me. If he gets caught with another woman and his wife deals with it, that’s between Mr. and Mrs. Trump Period! The Hush money trial was more of an issue, because it was tax evasion, and if you want to be President, then that is A Big One.
Overstating your assets? To me, that was more of a Witch Hunt. All the financial institutions were paid back, so where is the harm?
Screwing over contractors and their employees for their work is my issue. I’m still voting for him, but can’t stand him.
 
These are fiction but the left doesn't believe in the 1st, 2nd, or 4th amendments. And isn't there one about a speedy trial? Some J6ers have been held hostage for 2 years.

Dude -- you write some funnyt sh*t.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...control-decisions-next-after-overturning-roe/

Tell me the far right is pro 1st Amendment when the 'Moms for Liberty' STOP trying to ban books.

4th Amendment? Both sides of the political sphere struggle with that amendment.

Jan 6 Insurrectionists, Seditious citizens being held hostage? Let me guess, you were in FAVOR of Adolf, Erich, Ernst and others actions in 1923.
 
What does that mean?

I believe All American citizens have the right to vote unless they are a convicted felon.

We should love everyone.

So, do you think it's ok for a 10 year old to marry?

I'm not sure this is a right, but it does seem to be acceptable by the majority of Americans.

Research Body Autonomy.

States decide who should vote pre-, post-felony convictions

I've never read a position paper, statement from a MAGA politician advocating for RAISING the marriage age

1722358882317.png

Clarence Thomas doesn't believe you have a right to use birth control.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...control-decisions-next-after-overturning-roe/
 
I'm not so sure the government should allow anyone to get married these days. I partially joke, but it's definitely great business for the divorce lawyers and the judges that hear the cases when half of them ultimately fail down the road.

It only got involved when Congress decided to give married couples a break on federal income tax (1913)
 
I will also say the locker room talk doesn’t bother me. If he gets caught with another woman and his wife deals with it, that’s between Mr. and Mrs. Trump Period! The Hush money trial was more of an issue, because it was tax evasion, and if you want to be President, then that is A Big One.
Overstating your assets? To me, that was more of a Witch Hunt. All the financial institutions were paid back, so where is the harm?
Screwing over contractors and their employees for their work is my issue. I’m still voting for him, but can’t stand him.
Hush money wasn't tax evasion! It was booked as legal expense. They charged him for campaign finance for which they did not have jurisdiction. And he was not convicted legally because the jury did not have to be unanimous.
 
Last edited:

Become a Supporting Member to remove this ad and help support the site.
It only got involved when Congress decided to give married couples a break on federal income tax (1913)

Yeah and that's another thing that can go away, along with getting tax breaks for having children. My view is if you want to play family, then pay for it yourself. My rate as a single person should definitely not be higher than someone that is married. How does that make any sense? Who do I fall back on if things go south?
 
Dude -- you write some funnyt sh*t.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...control-decisions-next-after-overturning-roe/

Tell me the far right is pro 1st Amendment when the 'Moms for Liberty' STOP trying to ban books.

4th Amendment? Both sides of the political sphere struggle with that amendment.

Jan 6 Insurrectionists, Seditious citizens being held hostage? Let me guess, you were in FAVOR of Adolf, Erich, Ernst and others actions in 1923.
The Supreme Court ruled abortion was not covered by federal laws so they sent it down to states.
The left is the one that wanted to ban books like Tom Sawyer, etc. What books have the right wanted to ban? Are you talking about child books with porn in them?
Nearly all of the Jan 6 prisoners just walked into an open Capitol when the Capitol police opened the doors for them. 95% of them were non violent and 3-4 protesters were killed that day and the media ignored it.
 

Become a Supporting Member to remove this ad and help support the site.
I'm not familiar with the marriage age controversy. I wouldn't know why that would be liberal or conservative. To me, that's a non-issue.

But go for it if it's that important to you.
 

Tax fraud. Anyways, I’m done talking this subject. If we’re back to The Olympics, I’m in.
If they used tax fraud to get him, it was a misdemeanor. He would owe taxes on $130,000. They then extended that to campaign finance felony charge.
They had to do that so they could call him a convicted felon.
 

Become a Supporting Member to remove this ad and help support the site.
Apparently, a lot of Democrats don't believe in birth control. They would rather use abortion.

I've heard the same... course, there are many, MANY studies that show the availability of birth control leads to fewer abortions...

But the GOP didn't like that message, felt it was advocating sex out of wedlock...
 
Hush money wasn't tax evasion! It was booked as legal expense. They charged him for campaign finance for which they did not have jurisdiction. And he was not convicted legally because the jury did not have to be unanimous.

the MAJORITY of all "book-cooking," be it 'legal expanses (to pay the mouthpiece to keep the hooker happy but QUIET), to lying about labor costs... to lying about material costs... to lying about value of properties IS Tax Evasion! Not tax avoidance but pure simple illegal tax evasion. Under NY law it's a misdemeanor, unless the prosecutor can tie it to the furtherance of a larger crime, much in the same way the many Mafia Dons were charged under RICO.

He's a criminal - period.
 
I'm not familiar with the marriage age controversy. I wouldn't know why that would be liberal or conservative. To me, that's a non-issue.

But go for it if it's that important to you.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politi...lawmakers-child-marriage-abortion-1235018777/

LOTS of stories on the GOP, The Right want the min. marriage age to remain as is... (it's state by state, not federal)

If you sign off on increasing min marriage from 15, 16 as some states currently have to a 'legit' 18-21... ALOT of those oops, pregnant 15-yo that MAY get married to the 17-yo now would have an abortion vice the child marriage
 
Back
Top