Video of the presser. Also put it in the initial post:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Kudos to Greg and Sherard. That had to be tough, but I think they're trying to heal the wounds this has caused. I wish Coach nothing but the best.Video of the presser. Also put it in the initial post:
I haven't had time to read through the different threads so I don't know what's been said. From my perspective parting ways with Coach Lancing was the correct choice. Clinkscales makes is a compelling argument, and ultimately the type of decision making that has any potential for success. I can't weigh Clinkscales's ability at finding the right replacement, I don't know anything about that, but based on his decision to let Lancing go after back to back wining seasons indicates courage, and the type of forethought necessary for any chance at success. It all boils down between the the 2 year vs 1 year extension, and how that would play out for the institution that is ISU basketball compared to how it would play out for the coach as an individual. If Lancing believed that the sophomore class could elevate him to the next level or allow retirement with legacy, Lancing was clearly looking out for only Lancing. The one year extension offered him continued employment, and still left Clinkscales room for maneuver. By insisting on a 2 year extension Lancing was taking that away. It would have been very easy for Clinkscales to have agreed and make the easy choice without rocking the boat. Not willing to rock the boat is the type of thinking that has cast the net of mediocrity over ISU for decades. It is now up to Clinkscales to capitalize on what Lancing has left him, no different then Lancing capitalizing on what MaKenna left for Lancing. It is my wish that a young dynamic coach sees an opportunity to prove himself, and build where Lancing left off. It may take more then one coaching change to do it, but without willing to accept change and the desire to win ISU will never grow. Clinkscales has made that gamble. If Clinkscales's gamble blows up in his face ISU doesn't really drop that far, but if he pulls it off, ISU gains everything.
That was a well thought out post. Don't necessarily agree, but kudos for bringing it.I haven't had time to read through the different threads so I don't know what's been said. From my perspective parting ways with Coach Lancing was the correct choice. Clinkscales makes is a compelling argument, and ultimately the type of decision making that has any potential for success. I can't weigh Clinkscales's ability at finding the right replacement, I don't know anything about that, but based on his decision to let Lancing go after back to back wining seasons indicates courage, and the type of forethought necessary for any chance at success. It all boils down between the the 2 year vs 1 year extension, and how that would play out for the institution that is ISU basketball compared to how it would play out for the coach as an individual. If Lancing believed that the sophomore class could elevate him to the next level or allow retirement with legacy, Lancing was clearly looking out for only Lancing. The one year extension offered him continued employment, and still left Clinkscales room for maneuver. By insisting on a 2 year extension Lancing was taking that away. It would have been very easy for Clinkscales to have agreed and make the easy choice without rocking the boat. Not willing to rock the boat is the type of thinking that has cast the net of mediocrity over ISU for decades. It is now up to Clinkscales to capitalize on what Lancing has left him, no different then Lancing capitalizing on what MaKenna left for Lancing. It is my wish that a young dynamic coach sees an opportunity to prove himself, and build where Lancing left off. It may take more then one coaching change to do it, but without willing to accept change and the desire to win ISU will never grow. Clinkscales has made that gamble. If Clinkscales's gamble blows up in his face ISU doesn't really drop that far, but if he pulls it off, ISU gains everything.
Did I say they weren't?I'm not quite sure what to say about this. Laravia and Williams are only the best big men we've had in decades.
Works for me, and we will see if he has A TREMENDOUS UPSIDE, and that is whether he stays or goes. His challenge is, he only has two years left to get TREMENDOUS!I care. And if you don’t think LaRavia has a tremendous upside then we have zero common ground for discussion
Come out the gates swinging. Welcome to the site.For what this is worth: I recently wrote about my experiences shadowing Daniel Bradley near the end of his presidency and then Deborah Curtis sometime during the first week of hers. I have thought about both of those days as each bit of drama (homecoming, the logo fiasco, and now this) has unfolded. Curtis killed my piece. It never ran. She replaced it with a piece written by her secretary... er... I mean her "chief of staff." My former editor left ISU about 18ish months ago, solely because of Curtis. And now STATE Magazine has even been wiped off of the internet.
I love my school. I was an equipment manger for the football team, and I've written about it more than once. It breaks my heart watching Curtis' leadership style slowly rip the place apart.
I know nothing about Lansing or Clinkscales (my former editor tells me Clinkscales is incompetent). But I DO know Curtis. Well... I know what it's like to cross Curtis, even when you think you're not crossing her.
I thought about cancelling my ISU license plate. I still have it. My love for the school ranks above my loathing for her.
This school needs more people like you. I’ll keep an open mind with Clinkscales, but hearing your (and others) experience with Curtis just pisses me off.For what this is worth: I recently wrote about my experiences shadowing Daniel Bradley near the end of his presidency and then Deborah Curtis sometime during the first week of hers. I have thought about both of those days as each bit of drama (homecoming, the logo fiasco, and now this) has unfolded. Curtis killed my piece. It never ran. She replaced it with a piece written by her secretary... er... I mean her "chief of staff." My former editor left ISU about 18ish months ago, solely because of Curtis. And now STATE Magazine has even been wiped off of the internet.
I love my school. I was an equipment manger for the football team, and I've written about it more than once. It breaks my heart watching Curtis' leadership style slowly rip the place apart.
I know nothing about Lansing or Clinkscales (my former editor tells me Clinkscales is incompetent). But I DO know Curtis. Well... I know what it's like to cross Curtis, even when you think you're not crossing her.
I thought about cancelling my ISU license plate. I still have it. My love for the school ranks above my loathing for her.
Certainly speaks volumes!For what this is worth: I recently wrote about my experiences shadowing Daniel Bradley near the end of his presidency and then Deborah Curtis sometime during the first week of hers. I have thought about both of those days as each bit of drama (homecoming, the logo fiasco, and now this) has unfolded. Curtis killed my piece. It never ran. She replaced it with a piece written by her secretary... er... I mean her "chief of staff." My former editor left ISU about 18ish months ago, solely because of Curtis. And now STATE Magazine has even been wiped off of the internet.
I love my school. I was an equipment manger for the football team, and I've written about it more than once. It breaks my heart watching Curtis' leadership style slowly rip the place apart.
I know nothing about Lansing or Clinkscales (my former editor tells me Clinkscales is incompetent). But I DO know Curtis. Well... I know what it's like to cross Curtis, even when you think you're not crossing her.
I thought about cancelling my ISU license plate. I still have it. My love for the school ranks above my loathing for her.
I too am trying to keep my opinions on Clinkscales open. Anyone can look pretty awful if they're working under leadership that hamstrings them. Thanks for your comment. My best to you.This school needs more people like you. I’ll keep an open mind with Clinkscales, but hearing your (and others) experience with Curtis just pisses me off.
You didn't read it wrong. Clink wants someone who'll be here for 5-7 years (his words) and he also said it's not a bad thing for a mid-major to be a stepping stone job....which negates a coach being here 5-7 years. Not to mention, ain't no new coach being offered a 5-7 year contract at ISU who isn't named Larry Bird.Was I the only one confused by the story about the extension/non-extension? Lansing wanted two years, ISU offered one, but then said they didn't keep him because he wouldn't be here for five to seven years? I could have read that wrong, but that's what it sounded like. And it makes no sense. Not that it really matters at this point.
That 5-7 year line is even weirder because it's not like Lansing is old. If he were employed by ISU for the next 7 years, he would be 60 years old at the end of the contract. (I wouldn't advocate for that, I'm just making the point.)You didn't read it wrong. Clink wants someone who'll be here for 5-7 years (his words) and he also said it's not a bad thing for a mid-major to be a stepping stone job....which negates a coach being here 5-7 years. Not to mention, ain't no new coach being offered a 5-7 year contract at ISU who isn't named Larry Bird.
Add our three confirmed transfer players so far.....it's a total sh** show at this point.