[September 24, 2011] Youngstown State (2-1) at Indiana State (2-1)

WANTED: Passionate Sycamore Fanatics. That You?

Register NOW to join our community of die-hard Sycamore fans.


Become a Supporting Member to remove this ad and help support the site.
I feel like I'm in a time warp and listening to Colt fans eight years ago as they debate whether or not quick strikes by Peyton Manning and Marvin Harrison are good or bad for the team.
 
I feel like I'm in a time warp and listening to Colt fans eight years ago as they debate whether or not quick strikes by Peyton Manning and Marvin Harrison are good or bad for the team.

It is really just a silly thought because no matter who the coach is, he wants to put up points. You NEED touchdowns to win games and they aren't going to appear out of nowhere. Take them where you can get them. And I played under a really old school coach...we ran the wing T for my freshmen year and he always told me, "you get a shot take it..." it's not a new school vs old school type thinking, it's just different views on the game...there isn't Just one offensive way to win a game... hell there r hundreds
 
Last edited:
I feel like I'm in a time warp and listening to Colt fans eight years ago as they debate whether or not quick strikes by Peyton Manning and Marvin Harrison are good or bad for the team.

They were bad for the team as the defense was not strong enough, that is why they had to go to a more control offense. If you have a strong defense then quick scores are ok, but if you don't chances are you will be in a shoot out.
 
They were bad for the team as the defense was not strong enough, that is why they had to go to a more control offense. If you have a strong defense then quick scores are ok, but if you don't chances are you will be in a shoot out.

I don't get this line of thinking. How do you even control something, when you're scoring 60 yard TD's... on a RUNNING play. It's not like ISU was out there throwing 40+ yard bombs all day.

Did you want Bell to fall down after 25 yards so they could run some more plays?

I always thought the point of football is to put up points. If you want to run the ball, fine, but you're running the ball with the goal of putting up points. And if your RB happens to average over 10 yards a carry, well then your defense just needs to go out there and perform.

You can't hide a defense in football. They have to be able to perform.
 

Become a Supporting Member to remove this ad and help support the site.
I don't get this line of thinking. How do you even control something, when you're scoring 60 yard TD's... on a RUNNING play. It's not like ISU was out there throwing 40+ yard bombs all day.

Did you want Bell to fall down after 25 yards so they could run some more plays?

I always thought the point of football is to put up points. If you want to run the ball, fine, but you're running the ball with the goal of putting up points. And if your RB happens to average over 10 yards a carry, well then your defense just needs to go out there and perform.

You can't hide a defense in football. They have to be able to perform.
You responded to a statement about the Colts and Manning to Harrison eight years ago. Not about today.
 
I don't get this line of thinking. How do you even control something, when you're scoring 60 yard TD's... on a RUNNING play. It's not like ISU was out there throwing 40+ yard bombs all day.

Did you want Bell to fall down after 25 yards so they could run some more plays?

I always thought the point of football is to put up points. If you want to run the ball, fine, but you're running the ball with the goal of putting up points. And if your RB happens to average over 10 yards a carry, well then your defense just needs to go out there and perform.

You can't hide a defense in football. They have to be able to perform.

The Colts started to hide their defense by going to a more ball control offense and not trying to score in 45 seconds and putting their defense back on the field. You hide a defense by controlling the line of scrimmage and driving the ball down the field scoring something, hopefully a touchdown. You take up 6-8 minutes and it puts pressure on your opponent to score something. Now they won't have time to run 90 plays.
 
The Colts started to hide their defense by going to a more ball control offense and not trying to score in 45 seconds and putting their defense back on the field. You hide a defense by controlling the line of scrimmage and driving the ball down the field scoring something, hopefully a touchdown. You take up 6-8 minutes and it puts pressure on your opponent to score something. Now they won't have time to run 90 plays.

Have you been watching the same Colts I have in recent years? They have a horrible Oline, can't run the ball consistently and frequently struggle with three and outs, especially with all the injuries they've had in recent years. I don't want to get into a Colts debate, but I disagree. The Colts have regressed, but Manning still gets it done with his skill and knowledge of the game. Ask him or Caldwell if they'd take a score on one or two plays and I guarantee they say "yes." They rarely get to now because they don't have the consistent deep threat and teams play the pass against them on nearly every down. If anything, they were more of a ball control team back in the days of Edgerrin James because of his slow, patient running style. They still got themselves into shootouts though because their defense was so bad.
 

Become a Supporting Member to remove this ad and help support the site.
And you don't hide your defense by trying to grind the clock. You put up whatever points you can and make the other team match you. Today, YSU almost did, but they threw a pick late and it cost them. That's what you hope for. If we didn't have all of those points racked up they would have easily outscored us in this game.

Our defense has to play better. Has to make more stops. I think we can all agree on that. They make more stops and that means more offensive possession, more offensive plays, fewer defensive plays.
 
Last edited:
And you don't hide your defense by trying to grind the clock. You put up whatever points you can and make the other team match you. Today, YSU almost did, but they threw a pick late and it cost them. That's what you hope for. If we didn't have all of those points racked up they would have easily outscored us in this game.

Our defense has to play better. Has to make more stops. I think we can all agree on that.

Plus one. It all starts at the corner position today IMO. I was seeing some mental errors by our corners (bad angles, footplacement, down and distance mistakes on press or backoff coverage) which caused our bane of existence to show up (short passing game)
 
And you don't hide your defense by trying to grind the clock. You put up whatever points you can and make the other team match you. Today, YSU almost did, but they threw a pick late and it cost them. That's what you hope for. If we didn't have all of those points racked up they would have easily outscored us in this game.

Our defense has to play better. Has to make more stops. I think we can all agree on that.

Grind the clock and SCORE, not just grind.
 
Plus one. It all starts at the corner position today IMO. I was seeing some mental errors by our corners (bad angles, footplacement, down and distance mistakes on press or backoff coverage) which caused our bane of existence to show up (short passing game)

The misdirection plays have been killing us, too. Interesting stat. They averaged five yards per carry and per pass.
 
Wow, two years ago we would have been happy if ISU only lost by a couple of touchdowns to a top 25 team. Now people are complaining because we didn't when by a big enough margin. Isn't it great to have a good football team to argue over for a change:footballhelmet:.
 

Become a Supporting Member to remove this ad and help support the site.
wow, two years ago we would have been happy if isu only lost by a couple of touchdowns to a top 25 team. Now people are complaining because we didn't when by a big enough margin. Isn't it great to have a good football team to argue over for a change:footballhelmet:.
hahahahahaha so true
 
Back
Top